Atlanta Financial Newsroom

Is There “Life” after the Stretch IRA for Your Estate Plan?

Is There “Life” after the Stretch IRA for Your Estate Plan?
Cathy C. Miller, MBA, CFP®, CRPS®, CDFA™
February 12, 2020

In the last addition of our newsletter, my colleague Chris Blackmon covered some of the tax implications of the newly-enacted SECURE Act. As you may know, the SECURE Act (which stands for “Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act”) was signed into law in late December and became effective January 1st of this year. As Chris outlined, the Act makes significant changes to how retirement accounts can be funded, drawn down, and passed on to the next generation. While many of these changes have obvious tax ramifications, in this article we want to explore further the less obvious estate planning impact of these changes.

If you own an IRA or a retirement plan, you have likely named an individual or a trust as the beneficiary of your account or plan. Most married individuals name their spouse (if they have one) as the primary beneficiary, since a spouse is able to rollover any proceeds received into a spousal IRA with no tax consequences. The SECURE Act doesn’t make any changes to spousal rollover rules, so this strategy is still effective. The primary issues come into play when a non-spouse or a trust receives funds from an IRA as either the primary or contingent beneficiary. Under the new Act, in these instances most estate plans will not work in the way they were initially designed.

The End of the Stretch IRA

Prior to the SECURE Act, if someone other than a spouse inherited an IRA or qualified retirement plan, the Required Minimum Distributions (RMD’s) were based on the beneficiary’s remaining projected lifetime. This allowed beneficiaries to “stretch” the IRA distributions over their lifetime, allowing more money to remain in the account growing income-tax free—hence the name “Stretch IRA.” For example, a 25-year-old beneficiary (with a life expectancy of 58.2 years) would have a relatively small required distribution. What happened if you preferred to name a trust to provide some control and protection of the assets, perhaps due to youth or financial inexperience of the beneficiary? Under the “Stretch IRA” we could still utilize the lifetime of the underlying trust beneficiary to calculate the required distributions. There was no negative tax impact from naming a trust as the beneficiary, and the desire for control and protection could be achieved.

Under the SECURE Act, beneficiaries other than a spouse must now remove ALL funds from the IRA and pay tax at their own ordinary income tax rates within 10 years of receiving the inheritance. There are only a few exceptions: a surviving spouse (as mentioned above), beneficiaries who are less than ten years younger than the original owner, a minor child, and a disabled or chronically ill beneficiary. For all other beneficiaries, this requirement to distribute all funds within 10 years will accelerate when taxes are due and may result in a larger overall tax burden. The loss of tax-deferred growth over many years may also mean non-spousal beneficiaries receive a meaningfully smaller after-tax inheritance from IRA’s and qualified plans than they would have under the old rules. In a nutshell, IRA’s inherited by anyone other than a spouse will not provide the same benefits as before.

What Steps Should You Take Now?

First, we are recommending that all clients review their beneficiary designations as a result of the SECURE Act. For example, if you have named a trust as a primary or contingent beneficiary of your IRA (as I have), we will want to review the language of the trust with you and your estate planning attorney to see whether modifications are needed. For example, does the trustee have the flexibility to make the IRA distributions required under the new tax law and to consider differences in individual and trust tax rates? For example, if the Trustee is allowed to distribute “part, all or none” of the income of the trust, this flexibility should allow the Trustee to make good decisions based on the child beneficiary, the tax rates and the circumstances. For example, it would allow the Trustee to distribute all of a particular IRA distribution to the child to obtain lower income tax rates…or it would conversely allow the Trustee to hold and accumulate an IRA distribution (and pay the higher trust income tax rates) if it is advisable not to make the distribution to the beneficiary. Therefore, if it is critical to be sure the plan you put in place previously will work as you planned with no unintended consequences under the new law.

Secondly, if your beneficiary is a non-spouse, you may want to consider other changes to your estate plan, such as utilizing IRA’s to satisfy charitable bequests. And depending upon the differences between your tax bracket and that of your beneficiary, some changes to your retirement income strategy could possibly be warranted.

Since all clients have unique lives, objectives and concerns, these changes won’t impact everyone in the same way. Some clients may need to make no changes, and some may need an adjustment to their estate plan.

Rest assured your team at AFA will be reviewing all accounts we manage with non-spousal beneficiaries and will be prepared to discuss this at your next review. However, if you have concerns you prefer to discuss in the interim, please feel free to reach out to your trusted advisor at Atlanta Financial for assistance with these important decisions.

Share This:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on google
Google+

Radical Generosity, a Growing Family Ambition

For young and growing families, it can be hard at times to justify a commitment to charitable giving. But philanthropy can take on several forms when it comes down to it. I’ve heard it referred to as the “three T’s of giving”- time, talent and treasure. All three are clearly very valuable aspects of our lives because each are finite in their own respect. As a wealth manager, I obviously see a great deal of focus placed on the monetary side of philanthropy and my professional experience tells me that our individual perspective on personal wealth is often a driver for assessing whether it is (or feels) appropriate to give away our money or things. The more you feel as though you have yet to achieve your own financial security, the more difficult it is to be motivated to give financially. Furthermore, when having a family to provide for, the decision can be increasingly difficult but arguably more important.

Read More »

Is There “Life” after the Stretch IRA for Your Estate Plan?

In the last addition of our newsletter, my colleague Chris Blackmon covered some of the tax implications of the newly-enacted SECURE Act. As you may know, the SECURE Act (which stands for “Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act”) was signed into law in late December and became effective January 1st of this year. As Chris outlined, the Act makes significant changes to how retirement accounts can be funded, drawn down, and passed on to the next generation. While many of these changes have obvious tax ramifications, in this article we want to explore further the less obvious estate planning impact of these changes.

Read More »

What is the SECURE Act and does it matter to me?

The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (“SECURE”) Act was signed into law on December 20, 2019.  With all of the discussion in the news around the political uncertainty, impeachment, and the looming trade war, one of the largest changes to retirement savings laws in recent years was passed with very little fanfare.  However, some of the changes will be significant.  I have tried to highlight what may impact the majority of our clients and readers.

The Act has a lot of positives such as simplifying rules and making 401k plans potentially available to more workers, pushing back the RMD age, and allowing contributions to IRAs past age 70.  The negative impact I see is the elimination of the stretch IRA which is a clear move by the government to raise tax revenues by forcing money out of inherited IRAs sooner.  I will discuss in more detail below, but this should be a time to review beneficiaries and discuss whether any change in your legacy planning should be made in response to the new laws. What do you need to pay attention to?

Read More »

Yearly Archive

Author Archive